RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02372
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without
characterization of service) be changed to RE code 3A which
would allow him to reenlist.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes his record to be in error. He was informed that he
could take a mental health evaluation in order to be eligible
for reenlistment. His file shows he withheld medical
information on his enlistment physical and he states he did not.
The applicant provides no additional supporting documentation in
support of his appeal.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 13 May 2008.
The applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to
recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force under the
provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208. The specific reason
for this action was the Behavioral Analysis Service (BAS)
letter, dated 17 July 2008 which indicates the applicant was
diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and
depressed mood. Because of this diagnosis, he did not meet
retention standards and his ability to function in a military
environment was significantly impaired. His diagnosis also
disqualified him for the personnel reliability program (PRP),
security clearance, and weapons handling, which did not allow
him to continue further training in security forces. He was
also disqualified him from retention in the Air Force.
The applicant was advised of his rights in this matter and
acknowledged receipt of the notification. He waived his right
to consult with counsel and waived his right to submit a
statement on his own behalf.
The discharge authority concurred with the recommendation and
directed discharge. The applicant was discharged on 9 September
2008 with an uncharacterized, entry-level separation. He served
3 months and 27 days on active duty.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the RE code 2C is
required based on the applicants involuntary discharge with an
uncharacterized character of service and the applicant did not
provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to
his RE code.
The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AETC/SGPS recommends approval. SGPS states based on the
documentation on file in the applicants records, they find the
separation was done in accordance with established policy and
administrative procedures. Should the applicant now meet the
mental health criteria they can support his request.
The SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 6 September 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within
30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case to include the differing opinions of the Air
Force evaluators. However, the Board agrees with the opinion
and recommendation of AFPC/DPSOA that the applicant does not
provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to
his RE code. Therefore, we adopt their rationale as the basis
for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary,
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-02372 in Executive Session on 28 January 2014,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 February 2013.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 24 June 2013.
Exhibit D. Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 15 August 2013.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 September 2013.
2
3
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05509
It also disqualified him from retention in the Air Force. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 August 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02810
The applicant was discharged on 19 May 2008. AFPC/DPSOY will provide the applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with an RE code of 2C, unless otherwise directed by the board. The SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 December 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E).
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01600
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be changed to honorable and his reentry (RE) code 2C (involuntarily separated with honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to 1 to allow him to reenlist. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01413
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01413 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or, entry-level separation without characterization of service) and narrative reason for separation (Erroneous Entry), be changed to allow him to reenter...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01278
The applicants DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code of 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. We also note the RE code the applicant received at separation was technically incorrect and his records will be administratively corrected to reflect the RE code 2C, which accurately reflects he received an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01278 was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05034
DPSOA states the RE code 2C is required based on the entry level separation with uncharacterized character of service and the applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01172
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01172 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities, test or void involuntary...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05836
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05836 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant also stated his desire to leave the military due to increased anxiety and stress at home. DPSOA states the RE code 2C is required based on the entry level separation with uncharacterized character of service and the applicant does...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03334
On 7 Apr 09, the applicant was furnished an entry level separation with uncharacterized service for erroneous enlistment, with an RE Code of 4C, and a narrative reason for separation of Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02616
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02616 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4C (Failed medical procurement standards) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to reenlist. On 26 Aug 10, the discharge authority directed the applicant receive an ELS under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation...